Ultra-processed Foods and Children: State-of-the-art review

2.12.25

This state-of-the-art review on ultra-processed foods (UPF) and children consolidates evidence from around the world on how rising UPF consumption undermines children’s nutrition, health and well-being. The review finds strong evidence that UPF intake in children is linked with poor diet quality, overweight and obesity, and dental caries. A growing body of research also associates UPF intake in children with undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, mental health concerns, metabolic changes and an increased risk of chronic diseases later in life. This evidence provides the basis for advocating for and developing stronger legal measures and policies to counter the rise of UPFs in children’s diets through actions that protect children’s food environments and place child rights before commercial interests.

Ultra-processed foods: time to put health before profit

The rise of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in human diets is damaging public health, fuelling chronic diseases worldwide, and deepening health inequalities. Addressing this challenge requires a unified global response that confronts corporate power and transforms food systems to promote healthier, more sustainable diets, according to a new Lancet Series on UPFs and human health, published on Nov 19.
_______________________________-

Global Nutrition Targets 2030 Breastfeeding Brief from WHO and UNICEF PDF

Overview

Exclusive breastfeeding – defined as the practice of only giving an infant breast-milk for the first 6 months of life (no other food or water) – has the single largest potential impact on child mortality of any preventive intervention. Exclusive breastfeeding provides essential, irreplaceable nutrition for a child’s growth and development. It provides protection from respiratory infections, diarrhoeal disease, and other potentially life-threatening ailments. Exclusive breastfeeding also has a protective effect against obesity and certain noncommunicable diseases later in life.

 

Feeding Profit

How food environments are failing children.

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Feeding

Profit. How food environments are failing children. Child Nutrition Report 2025, UNICEF, New York, September 2025.

Link to full and brief UNICEF report in many languages

IBFAN Statement on Medela  September 2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Penelope Milsom, Nathan Dumont-Leblond and David McCoy (2025). Corporate accountability in food system governance? A case study of the Access to Nutrition Initiative’s Global Index. United Nations University International Institute for Global Health (UNU-IIGH).   September 2025

ATNi_Corporate_accountability_in_food_system_governance

__________________________________________________

The rise of multi-stakeholderism, the power of ultra-processed food corporations, and the implications for global food governance: a network analysis. Open access Published: Cite this article Scott Slater, Mark Lawrence, Benjamin Wood, Paulo Serodio, Amber Van Den Akker & Phillip Baker

________________________________________________

Corporate Power and Human Rights in Food Systems.

The  final report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Mr. Michael Fakhri will be  presented to the UN General Assembly on 17 October 2025. language versions HERE

Corporate power in food systems is highly concentrated, allowing a relatively small group of people to shape food systems in a way that serves the ultimate goal of profit maximization instead of the public good. In the present report, the Special Rapporteur examines how a relatively small number of corporations have amassed so much power over our food systems and outlines what is to be done to: curtail corporate power; ensure food markets are fair and stable; and hold corporations accountable for human rights violations in food systems.

Some excerpts: 17. Most alarming is the disproportionate targeting of children. Food and beverage marketing is pervasive, with the majority of food types marketed to children as part of an approach aimed at influencing their preferences, requests, purchases and eating behaviours, and increasing the risk of childhood obesity. Relatedly, despite the prohibition on advertising and other forms of breast-milk substitutes, some industry tactics include marketing practices that spreading false health and nutrition claims, the cross-promotion of milks and associated brands for infants, toddlers, older children and adults, as well as lobbying and the use of trade associations and front groups.25

_____________________________________________________

Commercial determinants of infant and child health: A focus on Nestlé’s baby food products marketed in Africa

E.W. Dumbili EW, Bwalya J & Osborne A. 2025.  . 33; 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101186
The researchers conducted a case study narrative review of the Public Eye and the IBFAN’s investigation report and “contextualised and interpreted this information with evidence from published research”. This review asked the following central question: “To what extent do Nestlé’s business practices, as reported in the Public Eye and IBFAN’s investigation, constitute a Commercial Determinant of Health?”
________________________________________________________________________

IBFAN calls on UNESCO to end its education collaboration with Nestlé

IBFAN-UNESCO-Nestlé 12.9.25

From the archive – IBFAN papers on CORPORATIONS IN EDUCATION

 

Tackling  obesity Schools 

Tackling Obesity Schools Feb 12

Seeing through the Spin (Education pack)

  • Tagged on:         

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.