Douglas Nascimento Santana, speaking for Brazil, said that they intend to propose a World Health Assembly (WHA) Resolution on the digital marketing of breastmilk substitutes.

IBFAN PR EB154.

Rough Transcript of debate on Maternal Infant and youn Child Nutrition

PRESS RELEASE

Digital Marketing is out of control – Brazil calls for a Resolution to protect mothers and babies 

WHO 154th Executive Board, WHO HQ, Geneva, 22 – 27 January 2024.

At WHO’s Executive Board (EB) meeting in its Geneva HQ last week, the many serious emergencies caused by conflicts and climate events were on everyone’s minds. IBFAN’s role was, once more, to remind everyone of the importance of addressing conflicts of interest and safeguarding and supporting women who want to breastfeed – a lifeline for so many babies that provides food, nurturing care and immune support.

The Debate on Maternal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition did not take place till 10pm on Friday night, but still 25 EB Members spoke up – with about 20, including Lesotho speaking for the 47 African states, congratulating WHO for its Guidance on regulatory measures aimed at restricting digital marketing of breastmilk substitutes[i] and promising to implement it. Douglas Nascimento Santana, speaking for Brazil, said that they intend to propose a World Health Assembly (WHA) Resolution on the digital marketing of breastmilk substitutes.

“Brazil believes that addressing this issue is crucial to guarantee that public health interests prevail. Brazil urges member states to strengthen the regulation of digital marketing for breast milk substitutes by adopting effective measures to safeguard the healthy development of children … Together, let us work towards a future where every child has the opportunity to thrive in growth in a healthy environment.”

The Guidance published in November 2023, followed WHO’s usual strict procedures and a comprehensive review of evidence that was provided to the 75th WHA in 2022. 65 Member States and Civil Society Organisations responded to an open public consultation that took place in September 2023. [ii]

The Guidance aims to help Member States tackle a problem that was not envisaged when the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes was adopted in 1981, and the issue of Digital Marketing demonstrates the continuing need for biennial reporting to the WHA – the world’s highest health policy setting body.  20 WHA Resolutions and Decisions have been adopted since 1981 that have updated the Code in line with marketing and scientific developments.[iii]

While more and more of us are relying on digital tools and artificial intelligence, these technologies have also created new risks. Digital marketing tools can be powerfully persuasive, extremely cost effective and often not easily recognizable as promotions. They are now the predominant source of exposure to misleading messages with manufacturers of baby feeding products paying influencers and using algorithms and deceptive schemes to target pregnant and lactating women, persuading them to feed expensive, ultra-processed and environmentally wasteful products that harm children’s health.[iv]

With its long experience working alongside WHO and UNICEF to strengthen global trading standards, IBFAN has seen how WHA Resolutions, when integrated into Codex standards, can help Member States bring their laws into line with WHO recommendations and prevent unjustified trade challenges.[v]  IBFAN made interventions on Emergencies, SDGs Governance conflicts of interest and Climate Change,  reminding Member States that the recommendations in the Guidance do not prevent legitimate digital marketing of commercial products, but call on health authorities to prevent harmful marketing, especially cross-border marketing,  of products that compete or interfere with breastfeeding and sound infant and young feeding practices.(vi)

For more information contact:

Patti Rundall, prundall@babymilkaction.org

Dr Marina Rea, marifrea@usp.br

Ellie Mulpeter, info@INFACTUSA.org

Nair Carrasco, lactared.direccion@gmail.com

NOTES:

Webcast of MIYCN debate. Session 14 Friday evening MIYCN Draft Transcript. EB Members (34).   Participants list

[i] In 2022, WHO’s report on digital marketing of breast-milk substitutes  described its cross border extent and power

[ii] The Guidance covers products that fall with the scope of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes ­and the 20 Resolutions that have strengthened and clarified it (together referred to as “The Code”.    The Code was adopted in 1981 and is the first global tool designed to control commercial marketing. Its aim is “to contribute to the provision of safe and adequate nutrition for infants, by the protection and promotion of breastfeeding, and by ensuring the proper use of breast-milk substitutes, when these are necessary, on the basis of adequate information and through appropriate marketing and distribution” 1.

[iii] To date 144 WHO Member States (74% of the 194) have adopted legal measures to implement at least some provisions of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes. However, under pressure from industry and their trade bodies, far too many laws contain loopholes that allow misleading marketing to continue.  2022 Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: national implementation of the international code, status report 2022 WHO UNICEF IBFAN

[iv] All 6  IBFAN interventionsMaternal Infant and Child Nutrition,  EmergenciesGeneral Programme of Work,  SDGsClimate Change and FENSA highlighted the need to support and protect women who want to  breastfeed – a resilient practice that provides food, nurturing care, immune support and is a lifeline in emergencies. IBFAN called for Pre-preparedness plans to follow the  IFE Operational Guidance and ensure that emergency appeals do not promote  ultra-processed products as magic bullets or undermine breastfeeding and culturally appropriate foods, bio-diverse foods.

[v] After 10 years of struggle, Codex puts child health before trade at last. IBFAN Press Release, March 2023, following the Codex Nutrition meeting in Gernmany.   While governments have the sovereign right to adopt any legislation they consider necessary to protect child health as long as it does not violate international trade principles,  weak Codex standards have regularly been used in attempts to stop governments bringing in strong marketing controls.  These threats have been highlighted in the 2023 Lancet Series on BreastfeedingINTERVENTIONS AT WTO AND CODEX RELATED TO NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WHO INTERNATIONAL CODE OF MARKETING OF BREASTMILK SUBSTITUTES.  Katheryn Russ*

Global trading standards must follow WHO in restricting harmful marketing

(vi) Poorly-resourced countries should not be expected  tackle cross-border marketing problems alone. Babies in these countries stand to suffer the most when breastfeeding is undermined. Exporting nations such as the USA, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Europe, Japan and China all profit from formula sales, yet take no responsibility for their companies. The European Union in 1992, in an attempt to address problems with the EU’s enormous export of breastmilk substitutes to Africa and other developing countries, an EU  Council Resolution was passed, calling on EU-based companies to comply with the Code when marketing in importing countries. The Resolution also outlined monitoring, reporting and accountability proposals.[7]  It’s high time this idea was revisited, strengthened and converted into binding EU Regulation.

EU Council Resolution on marketing of breast-milk substitutes in third countries by Community-based manufacturers. (Official Journal C 172 , 08/07/1992):  “Whereas the application of the International Code provides without doubt an excellent way to achieve this in these countries … 1. The Community will contribute to the application of appropriate marketing practices for breast-milk substitutes in third countries.2……the Commission will instruct its delegations in third countries to serve as contact points for the competent authorities. Any complaints or criticisms with respect to the marketing practices of a manufacturer based in the Community could be notified to them.3. The Commission will be ready to examine such cases and to assist in the search for a satisfactory solution for all parties concerned.”  EU Export Directive (required labels in the appropriate language)

 

Breastfeeding, first-food systems and corporate power: a case study on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry in Brazil. Pachón Robles et al.  Globalization and Health volume 20, Article number: 12 (2024).  This article explores the exploitative marketing of commercial milk formula (CMF) reduces breastfeeding, and harms child and maternal health globally. Brazil is used as a case study to understand the power of the baby food industry’s marketing and corporate political activity, and how this influences the country’s ‘first-food system’ in ways that promote and sustain CMF consumption.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.